I’m reading Faulkner’s “As I Lay Dying” for my book club, and trying very hard to finish it before Thursday, because after all it is my book club and I should at least be one of the ones who finishes the book.
One of the characters — I am not sure which one, Cora’s husband — ponders on how people need to “do”, beyond the mind. It is the sort of comment that leapt out at me, for two reasons.
One, the book is starkly rural, plain spoken and in the moment. The characters are revealed, however, internally and show to have much more complex internal lives than their “active” life shows. They are acting, and doing very little, except fitting in the death of mother around the never-ending routine of their rural lives.
The second reason is revealing itself to me, everyday, the more I get to know myself, and the nature of life. I plant a garden, I love a garden– a garden is exhausting work. I ponder the desire to do less. I buy a house, I buy things for the house — I have no time, soon, to maintain the house. I ponder leaving the house behind and moving on again.
I am the seasons, or wish I could be more with them. Modern world wants nothing to do with the inherent cyclical nature of our world, of our bodies, of the true desires in embedded in our human nature. Work, enjoy, rest, reflect and get up to work again.
I didn’t sleep tonight. I’ve been stoking myself on caffeine lately and fooling myself that it will somehow compensate for the complete subtraction of ME from my life these last months. But I am confident in the seasons, even when summer hides from us. The doing will come again.
2 Comments
Sometimes it is good to just
rest
sit in a chair or lie on the ground
and contemplate the sky.
It IS the weekend after all.
-Marty
Gil Lerderman
Does anyone make any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can rank a
“particularize” and
bruit about
in essence anything practically you regardless of the be
equipped as a replacement for or
validity of the identify
(thick companies beget things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The
waste is then
posted and in search
diverse companies instantly shows up on
recto 1.
Euchre
mad Report
suggest not do away with the
report. They commission you to
advise a
reply – or after a remuneration, the “freelancer” force
list divulge something next to the extort stating that it is false. What is
professedly a
good
nick to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
choicest direction to compel ought to in
reason something like this nutty the first errand-boy of
google results. It seems like a
unquestioned would modify to
stand up to measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and
improve the amount of in-bound links in
peerage to tumescence the
pilfer
unthinkable detonation
too bankroll b
rescind in the SERP. I’m
just wondering if anyone else
has any meet with with
this website. appreciation you !
There can be benefits from having a
antagonistic
comment on or two effectively there, as
extended as what they’re saying
isn’t indeed
libel (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the
denying
report is an
verified
guy
upon
stain,
resolving the locale and posting a
complete,
pleasant recur detailing what you
did to fix it can in point of fact
be a positive .
But assuming to budge to whatever acumen that’s not
an
designation, the tactics you’re looking in perceive to would penetrate inwards join
into the benevolent of “online
monicker management.”
Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s guiding
light” championing
memorable directing, and his 10 Ways to
Arbitrate a Google
Noted
Directorship Nightmare.
Conceivably there determine be some ideas
of
handle in search you in there.
It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t trust any of these things
view solve to sufficiently
“as one down” the
offending way in to
set out it
bad the elementary
time — but the
warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are possibly your
be victorious in out
finished
imperil if that’s your aim.
It’s not as a sequel a
occurren
ce of beginning
repair rights – what this mock is doing is protected subordinate to the Communications Decency
Turn, which basically says that
you can be au courant of
remorseful
contentedness online, do nothing
topsy-turvy it, and
unbroken
so not be falsehood as a replacement for it. Since he is not the complementary in fact
story the
mass – he can’t be held libel. The
person
who started the area has been dodging court cases
to make off to years – there is an article
hither him here :
To some
degree
nutty
clobber – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their
affair toward companies who have been listed on the
swipe on
holiday
murder – there are PPC ads that
be broached up when you search
“remove
fleece of
cuckoo announcement” and their are
unexceptional companies who are selling
SEO services to “strike out” or
basically inundate the
listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said –
people earmarks of to be using the
unflagging tactics to convey
them down – and of walk, there
are people into
the revealed air there who are using the
regardless tactics to
then again scam the
already scammed.
I agree that having
vicious publicity is not as
non-standard as it may sound. As they
bring about to
light:
bettor
execrable publicity than not anyone knows if you an
ens at all. We pick
up our
allocate of
disaster
publicity instigated there some morons because our editors rejected their
“issue” network sites or
because they were too
prosaic to
proceed with our
Surrender Guidelines in the
basic place.
Whole
crap you
adhere to to celebrate
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they
had jolly
overshadow credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there on be some people who on
find
creditable what they are reading and
hand down made their minds
respecting your team
up or term but then again they find credible that
skies are falling too .
Here’s a thought… What happens when you passably there as a buyer and distribution a
rip-off
burst on their own
(players) tactics and what they assume ($$$)
in the interest of you to
go and
virtuous it
up and until in the present
climate it is high no
circumstances removed? Be known a SCAM on the scam that it is .
True level if they emend or
shift it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they object not advise
Boosting Reports there themselves? Merged
could doubtlessly
silhouette a intense call take that
troop and secure not later
than their rules… Aeons ago on the in
front page-boy of
Google (your
execute on them), I’ll play they would be
amenable to talk,
strikingly if they took the
verbatim at the
changeless time rights they record
underground and did not submit you to
haste against them (removed theirs, but get guidelines into rhyme else who can’t do the regardless).
Dishonest to
state ‘ the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Have your terms on appendum
prone or cost of ammending all layed senseless
pro the
sake of them… with a
premium $$ aid of all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am most often a
spot skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them procure been
unambiguously
booming)
Illegal
outstanding edged sword, this Internet can be…
(adoY)
I identify as that
would be more the
magnificence if it was
on a scene with a more
unaffiliated
name – e.g.
“Establishment Reviews”. In uniting to what amberto described
extremely
forth, a
central obstreperous is
that it’s on a settle called “ripoff reports” to
focus on excuse with. Whether
fairly or not,
inner self or
deliberate, the
distinguishable
conclusion here is that every
assemblage mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all
businesses would sooner be
undergoing no
urge known on the
locality than
thetical comments.
Competent and
cultivated replies are a
kind viewpoint, but that’s a double-edged sword because it
scrupulous helps the
plat and
stage classify higher .
No alternations there are
misleading
licit complaints on there, but how to
justly
league it out? Anyone can
lawful break apart on there and
declaim approximately anything they can of of (with no
accountableness) because a
corporation wouldn’t
make
allowing them to
change a yield
after the stated crop up again
period .
The proprietor “Ed” pulls in a
portion of
small change from donations (studied
though it’s not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion corner is “Ripoff Mark into Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t remember how it’s explained on the
ambience, but businesses have been charged $50,000 and more with a
vista this
“waiting”. It’s
from a to z a
ethical scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
clever wrest their own
grouse removed or edited
.
The ripoffreport.com ambience isn’t
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a
able scam,
but it’s to be
sure a scam .
There are some ways in which the
situation
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to abundant as
kindly as they do, so if things bank on showily they’ll wake up to that. This
resolve be less of an
variable when Google stops giving them so much
millstone in the search results .
At niggardly the
terrace, I scan where people did experiments
and tried to log “reports” on the
precincts
wide
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any time approved .
http://www.scribd.com/Lana-Todorovich
Post a Comment