Where Wisconsin Is…

…And Other  Existential Observations on Home

My colleague (we both teach at university) said, quite innocently:

“I guess I don’t think of Wisconsin as the Midwest.”

This while I was rapping a heavy mix of Madison virtues and Midwest easiness.

“Oh,” she said when I called up the map. “I guess I thought it was over by Ohio and Pennsylvania.”

She said she wasn’t that great with “geography.”

Living on the East Coast is like being trapped in an episode of the Gilmore Girls.

Insanely intelligent-sounding people are constantly rattling in run-on sentences, fueled by tidal marshes of Dunkin Donuts coffee. They’ve got so much to say about staycations, community gardens, the humane treatment of turtles, and “red states,” they quite often ramble themselves into thoughtless places of emotionally conjugated human illogic.

Whenever I watch “The Gilmore Girls,” though, I can’t help but remember that Lorelei has never left Connecticut. She’s an expert on the trivia of pop culture, and can perfectly analyze a muffin without opening the bag. But could SHE find Wisconsin on an unlabeled map?

What I Mean To Say…

This is usually where people expect me to say that the Midwest is BETTER than everywhere else. I don’t mean that.

I will say that it surprises me that no matter where I go, people seem to be really glad to tell me how much better “HERE” is than someplace else. And usually that is followed by their complete lack of knowledge of that someplace else.

Personally, I love other places. I suppose my failing is not being able to love HERE enough, while I am living it.

Elizabeth Howard

Elizabeth writes literary non-fiction, haiku, cultural rants, and Demand Poetry in order to forward the cause of beautiful writing. She teaches and speaks about the rhetorical impact of beautiful writing. A recent transplant to Connecticut, she calls London, Kansas City, and Iowa home.

 

Tags:

  3 comments for “Where Wisconsin Is…

  1. Marty
    November 17, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    What I always enjoy is the comparison ; “Wow, this area of France is <<>> Wisconsin”,(except maybe the 12th century churches…). Much like when traveling to Europe or Asia and comparing a famous painter there with “Gee, he/she must have copied or studied with, (insert famous American artists here), to paint like that!” Places and people are wholly unique, and yet both are melded and molded by those who came before and those you will yet come to be. Just wishing more of the people knew more fully of more of the places and their people.

    • November 18, 2010 at 7:15 am

      One thing I DO like about that kind of statement is that is shows contextualization– the attempt by someone to understand a continuity between places, even if the logic is backwards.

      I try to teach that to my students everyday: the interconnectedness is what creates meaning for us, which ultimately creates learning. Of course, if your logic is backward, unfortunately, the learning might be flawed.

Comments are closed.